The Thesis Whisperer
In praise of redundancy
December 14, 2016 5:00 am
We hear a lot about under employment at the early career research stage, but not much about employment issues at the other end of your career.
What happens if you are made redundant later in life? This post is by Associate Professor Martin Davies, an honorary Principal Fellow in the Graduate School of Education, University of Melbourne. He picked up a satisfying non-academic job four months after being made redundant and tells us what he learned from the experience in this post. You can find out more about Martin on his website.
I thought I had this academic job business pretty much sewn-up: a double doctorate, six books and 70+ scholarly articles, over a million dollars in competitive research funding (in teams or solo). I was what they call “research active”—and I still am. I am also—by any measure—a good teacher. Moreover, I had a continuing position in a research-intensive university. If anyone was “safe”, I was.
Then it all went belly-up.
Seven of us were turfed-out unceremoniously with redundancy packages. The Faculty had decided we were all surplus to requirements.
Joseph Furphy began his under-appreciated magnum opus Such is Life with these immortal words: ‘Unemployed at last!’
Now I was going to know what it felt like.
I had been used to reading the occasional article about the parlous state of employment for doctoral holders—some of it on The Thesis Whisperer.
- What if I never get a job?
- Is academia really worth it?
- Academic job seeking and post doc unemployment
- America’s awful job market for scientists
- Stagnant job market for scientists
- Discussions about the job market
- The expendable PhD
These refrains are becoming all too frequent. I also occasionally come across PhD holders in Melbourne who drive taxis. I know that getting a PhD is not a necessary condition of gaining employment—indeed, it can sometimes hold one back. But I never thought that unemployment—redundancy especially—would happen to me. I was about to learn a salutary lesson.
Being unemployed, and holding a PhD, is nothing new. However, it seems to me that there is a silver lining in the dark cloud of the redundancy experience (or at least—foolishly perhaps–I choose to see it that way):
You are not alone.
Redundancy is a common enough experience amongst academics. I have met others who have been through it three times. One guy was a microbiologist. Another friend, who has never managed to nail an academic job for more than a few months, did his well-regarded doctorate in biochemistry (cancer research). I would have thought that specialisation was pretty necessary in the scheme of things, but no.
The redundancy experience spares no discipline, no matter how useful that research area might be.
It’s an outcome of the entrepreneurial university.
Universities, like widget factories, are no longer collegially-run places insulated from the Big Bad World by generous government funding. Now they are run by CEOs and accounts departments; hence, they are always scratching about to save money. Kicking people out is not driven by research considerations: it’s just a matter of book balancing.
Don’t take it personally. They might just as flippantly re-hire you when the good times swing back.
It’s a generational thing.
One of the most discussed topics on the TW is this one. It concerns the age imbalance of academics with older “baby boomer” academics not retiring and allowing younger academics to have a go. While this issue can lead to unnecessary and gratuitous age-bashing, there is no doubt that—with older, more experienced academics hanging on–there are fewer positions to go around.
When culling is needed it’s (generally-speaking) last on, first off—all things being equal (oddly, this is in dramatic contrast to the corporate world).
You had a shot at it.
Being made redundant means that you had a job to begin with. A lot of academics don’t even get that. If you are in any doubt read the story of one academic with a PhD in Sociology who gets called “complacent” by his JobSearch advisors for not answering ads for work as a cleaner or checkout operator. Sobering stuff.
It could be worse.
There are plenty of nasty diseases out there; these are far worse than not having a job I reckon. And when it is all said and done, getting rid of me was their loss (It’s important to be positive.)
Pay off the mortgage!
Since when does one ever get a large bucket of money to not work? This has a good side. It can be used to pay off ones’ mortgage. Provided the funds are not splurged on drowning one’s sorrows, this can be a definite benefit.
It draws a line.
One thing I found was that I could draw a line under the boring and tedious Faculty meetings that I never liked attending anyway. I could also sever ties I did not really want to keep. I could also spend some time finalising and completing all those “back-log” papers and advancing new ideas for books. Now, a year after the big event I have finished all those things I never thought I’d finish. This is quite satisfying. The research slate is clean and there is now time to read and write on new topics. Since being made redundant I have churned out four papers and a book (all published). I would have never have had this level of productivity whilst immersed in admin, meetings, and other duties.
So there’s a good side to the redundancy experience I suggest. Naturally it is preferable if it can be avoided. But it is not the end of the world. Would I recommend it? Sure, but finish your PhD and get a job first!
Related posts
What do academic employers want?
Posted by Thesis Whisperer
Categories: Your Career
Tags: redundancy, unemployment
13 Responses to “In praise of redundancy”
-
Good side only if you have saved enough money to pay the rent and eat. And if in the USA pay for health insurance if you live in a non-medicaid expansion state. Oh yeah… and those student loans. Economic hardship deferment only lasts for 3 years. It is also pretty hard to find a job after a gap in your vitae too. For the lucky few this might be a “good thing” for the rest of us, we already ate enough ramen in grad school.
By annon on December 14, 2016 at 7:39 am
-
Ha. Yes, I appreciate this point of view. I’ve eaten enough instant noodles myself too.
-
-
I can understand the “good side” of redundancy and I attended a key note by Prof. Ian Lowe who is was a noted chemistry scholar and now after leaving academia, is a noted sustainability scholar working on meaningful projects. However, as a tenured academic I see the ever rising performance expectations in my business school and wonder whether this will be the fate of many academics (including me), especially those deemed ‘older’ as a justification for redundancy/early retirement. Like this writer I know of a number of academics with a good record of research and teaching that have been moved out of academic positions. The brave new world of precarity.
By Susan Mayson on December 14, 2016 at 10:03 am
-
“Precarity”, yes it’s true. But there is little point whingeing about it and getting depressed, and wishing for the Halcycion days of 100% government funding and “old tenure” (I am not accusing you of that). I ain’t going to happen again.
-
-
Thank you for sharing your experience. Although I understand the benefit of looking at the good side of things, like Susan Mayson, I can’t help but feel a little worried about what this means about the state of higher education… Of course it’s a good thing that universities should be accountable somehow, but how can it be profitable to fire someone who is qualified, experienced and active? Was it presented as a sort of “early retirement”? Surely you can’t fire someone just because they are getting old!
By Aya on December 14, 2016 at 7:00 pm
-
Maybe they expect that you will keep working on research anyway, without having to pay you?
By Aya on December 14, 2016 at 7:36 pm
-
I don’t think the fact I was research active, etc., was even a thought in their heads actually (I’ve since been nominated for an Australia Day Award for services to education too). None of this matters a whit. They just needed to save some money and our department was the easiest to get rid of. What does it mean for the state of higher education? *There is no security anywhere.*
By wmartindavies on December 14, 2016 at 8:36 pm
-
Maybe job security is not the only issue here though, i’m thinking short term vs long term, quantity over quality etc. And the general impression that current politics would not even mind if the higher education was ruined, many just don’t see the value in it (that is, in the long run, not as immediate profit). But i guess it’s nothing new… it has happened at other times in history. Sad to see it happening again now.
By Aya on December 14, 2016 at 8:49 pm
-
-
-
Good on you Martin! I’ve been reading some of your articles, but didn’t realise your productivity stemmed from redundancy. I too was made redundant at a similar time to you, from the same institution. It was my second redundancy, and I highly recommend it! It’s not often we have time to focus on things that we’re interested in, and to clear the backlog, as you say. The generational issue concerns me too, and I wonder how many of us leave academia not because we wouldn’t make good academics, but rather, because we graduated at the wrong time. Some of my colleagues are truly brilliant and lead highly successful careers and lives in industry, which is great for them, and great for industry. We can only wonder what their contributions may have been, had they been given an opportunity to excel as an academic.
By Amy Helen on December 15, 2016 at 12:40 pm
-
Hi Amy: Do tell of your experiences!
I am starting to think that redundancy is a career option of sorts!
By Anonymous on December 19, 2016 at 9:39 am
-
-
I particularly liked the theme of this post, how to make the most of your talents in the face of redundancy. This is why I enjoy this blog. Real people, real experiences, so much to learn from.
By Shifa on December 17, 2016 at 6:24 pm
-
Re the point about the ‘generational thing’: I’m 57 years old and approximately six months away from PhD submission, which places me in both the age bracket of many established academics and the experience bracket of the emerging researcher. The best or worst of both worlds, depending on how you look at it.
I’ve spent the past 40 years accruing ‘life experience’, raising kids, and fitting in additional academic qualifications when I can. Five years ago, finding myself in that happy place when my kids and my parents were leading independent, competent lives, and my partner was willing and able to cover the income side of things, I finally got to start (part-time, initially) on my doctoral studies – a long-held goal. But now I’m faced with a dilemma. Can I, in fact should I, try and compete for academic positions against young people who need to kick career goals more than I do? And yet, if I don’t, have I wasted everyone’s resources over the past five years? I figure I have another ten years or so that I can contribute to the academic world – I’m fresh and enthusiastic, and I don’t feel ready to be ‘retired’. I believe my research has the potential to make a difference, and that this will be more likely in a Higher Education context.
What to do? I don’t want to do someone else out of a job, but I don’t want to sacrifice everything I have to offer, either.By postgradpanda on December 20, 2016 at 9:15 am
-
These are excellent questions – I don’t have answers, but I don’t a bleak view as some people do. I think this is a good subject for a blog post. Look out for it in the new year!
-
Leave a Reply
Name
Website
Notify me of new comments via email.
Notify me of new posts via email.
Mobile SiteFull Site
Blog at WordPress.com. Theme: WordPress Mobile Edition by Alex King.
fifa live stream 2018
ReplyDelete"Fifa Live 2018"